hiltit.blogg.se

Pdf reader ipaq
Pdf reader ipaq










Maximal handgrip strength ( r = 0.2 p<.01)

pdf reader ipaq

Poor concurrent validity of total physical activity compared to:

pdf reader ipaq

Six minute walk distance ( r = 0.3 p<.01) Maximal handgrip strength ( r = 0.3 p<.01) Poor concurrent validity of vigorous physical activity compared to: Poor concurrent validity: correlation weekday and weekend sitting time compared with accelerometer (r = 0.17, r = 0.01 respectively) (Craig, 2003 n = 744 18-65 years old, 12 countries)Īdequate concurrent validity for all physical activity and total sitting time compared to accelerometer (ρ = 0.33) Poor concurrent validity: correlation with time spent on occupational physical activity for obese workers compared with accelerometer (r = 0.27)

pdf reader ipaq

(Kwak, 2012 n = 441 mean age 49.4 years – 18-67 years old)Īdequate concurrent validity: correlation with time spent on occupational physical activity for both sexes, for men, and for women compared with accelerometer (r = 0.46, r = 0.44, r = 0.49 respectively)Īdequate concurrent validity: correlation with time spent on occupational physical activity for normal weight and overweight workers compared with accelerometer (r = 0.44, r = 0.55 respectively) Poor correlation of sitting time for men only (ρ = 0.24) (Rosenberg, 2008 n = 289 mean age 35.9 years)Īdequate correlation of sitting time and accelerometer recorded measurements for both sexes and for women only (ρ = 0.34, ρ = 0.43 respectively) Poor concurrent validity: correlation of time spent in moderate physical activity and total time spent sitting compared to accelerometer monitoring (ρ = 0.20, ρ = 0.17 respectively)Įxcellent concurrent validity: correlations of time spent in sitting and physical activity at work compared to log book monitoring (ρ = 0.75, ρ = 0.64 respectively)Īdequate concurrent validity: correlations of time spent in physical activity at home and during leisure time compared to log book monitoring (ρ = 0.47, ρ = 0.58 respectively) Vigorous-intensity activities have been established as >6 METs.Īdults: (Hagströmer, 2006 n = 46, 19-62 years old, mean age 40.7 ± 10.3 years)Įxcellent concurrent validity: correlations of time spent in vigorous physical activity compared to accelerometer monitoring (ρ = 0.71)Īdequate concurrent validity: correlation of total time spent in physical activity, in combined vigorous and moderate physical activity compared to accelerometer monitoring (ρ = 0.55, ρ = 0.36).Moderate-intensity activities have been established as between 3 and 6 METs.(Craig, 2003) Amount of physical activity places patient in 1 of 3 categories:ġ) Low/inactive – do not meet criteria for categories 2 or 3Ī) or more days with at least 20 minutes of vigorous activityī) 5 or more days with at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity activity or walkingĬ) 5 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate-intensity, or vigorous intensity activities with at least 600 MET-min/weekĪ) 3 or more days of vigorous-intensity activity and at least 1500 MET-minutes/weekī) 7 days of any combination of walking, moderate-intensity or vigorous intensity activities with a at least 3000 MET-minutes/week.Overall score calculated using responses to all questions.Duration (minutes) and frequency (days) of physical activity in the last 7 days is measured in domains of:ģ) Housework, house maintenance, caring for family.












Pdf reader ipaq